pro fluorogenic substrate Search Results


fluorogenic tripeptide substrate h met gly pro amc  (R&D Systems)
94
R&D Systems fluorogenic tripeptide substrate h met gly pro amc
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Tripeptide Substrate H Met Gly Pro Amc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/pmc12883895-58-10-18?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic tripeptide substrate h met gly pro amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluorogenic tripeptide substrate methionine glycine proline 7 amido methylcoumarin  (R&D Systems)
92
R&D Systems fluorogenic tripeptide substrate methionine glycine proline 7 amido methylcoumarin
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Tripeptide Substrate Methionine Glycine Proline 7 Amido Methylcoumarin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/bio_rxiv__2022__06__11__495772-267-27-31?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic tripeptide substrate methionine glycine proline 7 amido methylcoumarin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluorogenic substrate meosuc-ala-ala-pro-val-amc  (Bachem)
90
Bachem fluorogenic substrate meosuc-ala-ala-pro-val-amc
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Substrate Meosuc Ala Ala Pro Val Amc, supplied by Bachem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/us09440930-402-8-11?v=Bachem
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic substrate meosuc-ala-ala-pro-val-amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluorometric substrate mca-plgleea-dpa-nh2  (AnaSpec)
90
AnaSpec fluorometric substrate mca-plgleea-dpa-nh2
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorometric Substrate Mca Plgleea Dpa Nh2, supplied by AnaSpec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/pmc04343044-211-11-14?v=AnaSpec
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorometric substrate mca-plgleea-dpa-nh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluorogenic substrate mca-apk-dnp  (Bachem)
90
Bachem fluorogenic substrate mca-apk-dnp
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Substrate Mca Apk Dnp, supplied by Bachem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/pm37041017-180-4-7?v=Bachem
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic substrate mca-apk-dnp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluorogenic synthetic substrate h-gln-pro-arg-gly-arg-4-methylcoumaryl-7-amide (h-qprgr-mca)  (GL Biochem)
90
GL Biochem fluorogenic synthetic substrate h-gln-pro-arg-gly-arg-4-methylcoumaryl-7-amide (h-qprgr-mca)
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Synthetic Substrate H Gln Pro Arg Gly Arg 4 Methylcoumaryl 7 Amide (H Qprgr Mca), supplied by GL Biochem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/pmc02812541-105-1-9?v=GL+Biochem
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic synthetic substrate h-gln-pro-arg-gly-arg-4-methylcoumaryl-7-amide (h-qprgr-mca) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
pro-tumor necrosis factor-α converting enzyme (tace) fluorogenic peptide substrate; mca-(endo-1a-dap(dnp))-tnf-α (−5 to +6) amide (human), m-2255  (Bachem)
90
Bachem pro-tumor necrosis factor-α converting enzyme (tace) fluorogenic peptide substrate; mca-(endo-1a-dap(dnp))-tnf-α (−5 to +6) amide (human), m-2255
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Pro Tumor Necrosis Factor α Converting Enzyme (Tace) Fluorogenic Peptide Substrate; Mca (Endo 1a Dap(dnp)) Tnf α (−5 To +6) Amide (Human), M 2255, supplied by Bachem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/us09783615-518-42-60?v=Bachem
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pro-tumor necrosis factor-α converting enzyme (tace) fluorogenic peptide substrate; mca-(endo-1a-dap(dnp))-tnf-α (−5 to +6) amide (human), m-2255 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluorogenic peptides vgr-amc  (Biomol GmbH)
90
Biomol GmbH fluorogenic peptides vgr-amc
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Peptides Vgr Amc, supplied by Biomol GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/pmc01900430-130-1-18?v=Biomol+GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic peptides vgr-amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
omnimmp tm  (Biomol GmbH)
90
Biomol GmbH omnimmp tm
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Omnimmp Tm, supplied by Biomol GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/pmc03196117-101-5-13?v=Biomol+GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
omnimmp tm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluorogenic substrate z-phe-arg-nhmec  (Bachem)
90
Bachem fluorogenic substrate z-phe-arg-nhmec
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Substrate Z Phe Arg Nhmec, supplied by Bachem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/pm10383426-89-1-27?v=Bachem
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic substrate z-phe-arg-nhmec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluorogenic substrate mca-pro-leu-gly-leu-dpa-ala-arg-nh 2 ·tfa  (Merck KGaA)
90
Merck KGaA fluorogenic substrate mca-pro-leu-gly-leu-dpa-ala-arg-nh 2 ·tfa
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Substrate Mca Pro Leu Gly Leu Dpa Ala Arg Nh 2 ·Tfa, supplied by Merck KGaA, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/pmc11416218-403-29-46?v=Merck+KGaA
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic substrate mca-pro-leu-gly-leu-dpa-ala-arg-nh 2 ·tfa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fluorogenic substrate boc-gln-ala-arg-amc  (GL Biochem)
90
GL Biochem fluorogenic substrate boc-gln-ala-arg-amc
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Substrate Boc Gln Ala Arg Amc, supplied by GL Biochem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pro+fluorogenic+substrate/pmc10663540-216-17-20?v=GL+Biochem
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic substrate boc-gln-ala-arg-amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the fluorogenic tripeptide substrate H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.

Journal: Febs Letters

Article Title: The Caenorhabditis elegans DPF ‐3 and human DPP4 have tripeptidyl peptidase activity

doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.70219

Figure Lengend Snippet: Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the fluorogenic tripeptide substrate H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.

Article Snippet: Enzymatic activities of hDPP4 and DPF‐3 were measured using the fluorogenic tripeptide substrate H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC (7‐amino‐4‐methylcoumarin, Catalog number: ES017, R&D Systems).

Techniques: Activity Assay, Mutagenesis, Concentration Assay, Fluorescence, Generated, Standard Deviation